The BBR article drops this nugget:
"If costs continue to outpace revenue, the city won't be able to afford expanding local government to their liking."
You know what? You might have better supported the "unlimited growth agenda" had you waited until after the upcoming elections to lay this out there.
Still, lots to unpack, most importantly who does "their" refer to and just what is their "liking?" Are we talking about just the unelected bureaucrats who thrive on spending other peoples' money or have we elected folks who have forgotten, or never knew, that Dunwoody was founded on commitments to fiscal prudence and spending restraint. What flipped in the city's DNA that switched on this cancerous growth seemingly limited only by restriction of revenue? Is there any way to cure this cancer without killing the host or has this city run its course? If the latter it is time to call on hospice, starve the cancer and wind this thing down. Vote accordingly.